PNG going Green

Posted: October 30, 2007 in Citizenship, Education, Information

Global warming has affected a lot of countries around the world and Papua New Guinea is no exception. Since PNG has so many small islands, most of them are in danger of being flooded due to rising sea level. For this cause, Grand Chief Somare is leading Papua New Guinea and pushing for more efforts in the Kyoto Protocol and asking countries to join the fight against climate changes.

Most of you have watched the documentary “Inconvenient Truth” by Al Gore, which gives you an idea of how important climate change is. The need of “Clean Energy” is in demand and the importance of Carbon Trade has now hit PNG.

Here is a write-up by Ogis Sanida explaining the rationale of Carbon Trade

The carbon trade rationale
By Ogis Sanida



Carbon trade is a new market-based mechanism which intends to encourage the reduction and/or offset of greenhouse gas emissions while, at same time, allows income creation. Such trade involves the buying and selling of ‘environmental services’. These services constitute activities that remove greenhouse gases which cause global warming from the atmosphere.

The carbon trade idea developed from the Kyoto Protocol that was signed in Kyoto, Japan, by some 180 countries in December 1997. The Protocol called for 38 industrialised countries to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions between the years 2008 to 2012 to levels lower than 5.2% of those in 1990. However, the Protocol did not give specific instructions on how countries will achieve their reductions. Carbon trade is a mechanism that was developed to address this shortcoming.

How does carbon trade work?
Carbon trade is supposed to work in the following way: An eco-consultancy firm, which plays the role of a broker or middleman, conducts an eco-audit of a client (individuals, industries/firms, or countries) and comes up with a reasonably accurate estimate of how much carbon the client’s activities release to the atmosphere.

At the other end of the operation, the eco-consultant searches the world for environmental services that could offset its client’s polluting emissions. These services are mainly forests and tree-planting projects, which are known in the carbon trade business as carbon assets or carbon sinks, because trees remove carbon from the atmosphere and retain it in their wood. Employing a variety of methodologies, the eco-consultant arrives at an estimate of how much carbon a particular sink retains, and then assigns it a monetary value and sells it to a client. The client then subtracts from its carbon account the carbon retained by its newly purchased carbon sink. The client is said to be carbon-neutral or climate-neutral when its carbon assets equal its carbon emissions.

In terms of income flows/creation, the eco-consultant receives money from its client and pays the environmental service providers, after subtracting its consultancy fees.

Types of carbon trade

There are three market-based ‘flexible’ systems of carbon trade: clean development mechanism (CDM), emissions trading system, and joint implementation system.

  • Clean development mechanism: This involves the trade of environmental services mainly between the industrialised and developing countries. The intention of CDM is to enable industrialised countries to meet their domestic emission reduction targets by investing in projects that reduce or offset greenhouse gas emissions in developing countries. Such projects typically focus on carbon-neutral projects such as renewable energy, energy efficiency, eco-forestry, wildlife conservation, and small-scale hydroelectric schemes. PNG is currently developing CDM projects through the Department of Environment and Conservation and other relevant stakeholders.
  • Emissions trading system: This mechanism mainly concerns trading of ‘pollution rights/permits’ among the industrialised countries. Under the system, countries or industries which exceed their pollution targets will have to buy extra quotas from companies or countries that undershoot their pollution targets.
  • Joint implementation system: This system is a specific form of the CDM where the Western and/or industrialised countries are to fund climate-friendly (or carbon-neutral) projects in the former Soviet Bloc.

The rationale
The rationale of carbon trade can be understood when we consider the impracticality of the environmental ‘purist’ argument on the one hand, and economic growth maximisation on the other.

Extremist environmental organisations argue that the only way to address climate change is for countries to undertake a direct reduction of carbon emissions by reducing ‘pollution-creating industrial activities’. These organisations contend that any other options are just an indirect blockage to the real solution to global warming which is reducing and finally eliminating fossil fuel burning. The idea that people can burn fossil fuels and then plant trees to clean up the carbon dioxide is simply wrong, so goes the argument. This false ‘solution’ will merely keep people digging up oil and coal. The only ‘solution’ is for countries to reduce carbon emissions.

However, the environmental ‘purist’ approach would be an ‘economic and social suicide’ for many countries. Outright reduction in industrial activities would lead to a fall in economic growth, loss of jobs and income. This would have a flow-on effect in the social arena where spending in health, education and other related activities will have to be cut. Because of such concerns, many countries have been reluctant to take the ‘purist’ approach. Until new technologies are commercialised, people will continue to drive cars, take flights and use energy from fossil fuel sources.

At the other extreme, some countries, mainly the big industrialised nations, are taking a rather passive approach to the global warming issue. These countries seem to think that they should continue to maximise industrial development and hope that future scientific advancement will provide the ‘vaccine’ to solve the global warming problem. If the adverse effects of global warming are correct, then outright ignorance of environmental issues would be detrimental to our welfare in the long term. The rights of citizens of a country or the global community, in general, to live in a secure environment would be compromised.

Given these two opposing scenarios, it is now obvious that carbon trade is the way forward. By reducing or containing carbon emissions and generating revenue, simultaneously, carbon trade addresses both the environmental and economic concerns. Carbon trade is not the perfect solution; however, it is the ‘best’, given the current situation.

Moreover, by its nature, carbon trade could have a wider appeal to governments and private sector entrepreneurs. The challenge facing countries venturing into this new form of international trade is how to plan for and implement it, in order to get the best value out of it, both in economic and environmental terms. In the PNG context, the current work of the Department of Environment and Conservation and the stakeholders in trying to get the CDM activities off the ground should be given full support by the Government, private sector and the NGOs.

Ogis Sanida is a Research Fellow with the Economics Studies Division of the National Research Institute

  1. Ms Dee says:

    Hey Rex ( or anybody else),

    Do you know what CDM projects the Department of Environment and Conservation are actually doing or undertaking?

  2. Rex says:

    Good Question.
    Thats something I would like to know also. They have not been doing much as far as I know. But now with the new Minister, I hear something is brewing as he is really concern about carbon trade.

  3. popol says:

    Hey Rex

    Hope all is great at your end.

    Yes I have watched Inconvenient Truth. An interesting and well presented documentation. I am amazed that to find that Al Gore is a master in presentation.

    I have to say thought that I am skeptical about Al Gore’s figures and statistics. I like the documentation but I think some of his figures and statistics need to be questioned.

  4. Rex says:

    Well, statistics vary alot from different organization. This may be due to individual research done and sometimes…there is a tendency to influence statistics to suit a common goal.

    At the end of the day……it’s your goal that you want to achieve and you may summarise data to suit you needs.

  5. popol says:

    So are u saying that Al Gore is “summarizing” data to suit his needs?

  6. popol says:

    By the way, how is it going back home. Hello to Aunty and all the others in the house.

  7. Rex says:

    This is whats happening in the real world. People always interpret data to suit their needs. Even mining companies doing environmental analysis wud summarise their findings as safe.

    It helps to get a second or third independent opinions on such issues!!

  8. popol says:

    I know that very well Rex and that is why I didn’t just swallow all of Al Gore’s facts. I know mining companies (especially in PNG, because we are so oblivious to many things) summarize findings as safe and get away with it which I totally go against. But that doesn’t mean I support and believe all of Al Gore’s facts. I mean I am just looking at all angles with an open mind and not believing anyone.

    I guess what I wanted say was Inconvenient Truth didn’t give me any idea how important climate change is. I know climate change is a serious issue because I already know about it. And he was right when he says we have been irresponsible and neglected the subject for long, but I already know about climate and I am just saying that I am in a better position to go for or against his facts and findings.

  9. popol says:

    And Al Gore’s documentary may give an insight into the seriousness of global warming but it also gives an insight into what his own needs are.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s